Posts

This collection compares ten plant Climate DNA profiles using the same occurrence filters, CHELSA variables, percentile method, and confidence gate. It is a data comparison, not a list of universal care targets. The common unit is the long-term outdoor climate attached to quality-filtered records inside each plant’s POWO native-country range. The cohort rule is reproducible: the remaining ten profiles after the current 20-plant dataset is split at the median coldest-month temperature. Every profile keeps its own native occurrence count, geographic coverage, and confidence visible. No unrelated location is used as a substitute for species-specific evidence. ...

These city guides compare local 1991–2020 NASA POWER climate normals with a CHELSA Climate DNA sampled at quality-filtered GBIF records for Ficus elastica. The outdoor score and the indoor care-pressure calendar answer different questions: whether outdoor macroclimate overlaps the plant’s recorded native climate, and when a local potted plant may need closer observation. Read the standalone Rubber Plant Climate DNA profile for the full native-record distributions, occurrence footprint, filtering funnel, confidence, and source provenance behind these comparisons. ...

These city guides compare local 1991–2020 NASA POWER climate normals with a CHELSA Climate DNA sampled at quality-filtered GBIF records for Maranta leuconeura. The outdoor score and the indoor care-pressure calendar answer different questions: whether outdoor macroclimate overlaps the plant’s recorded native climate, and when a local potted plant may need closer observation. Read the standalone Prayer Plant Climate DNA profile for the full native-record distributions, occurrence footprint, filtering funnel, confidence, and source provenance behind these comparisons. ...

These city guides compare local 1991–2020 NASA POWER climate normals with a CHELSA Climate DNA sampled at quality-filtered GBIF records for Phalaenopsis amabilis. The outdoor score and the indoor care-pressure calendar answer different questions: whether outdoor macroclimate overlaps the plant’s recorded native climate, and when a local potted plant may need closer observation. Read the standalone Phalaenopsis Orchid Climate DNA profile for the full native-record distributions, occurrence footprint, filtering funnel, confidence, and source provenance behind these comparisons. ...

These city guides compare local 1991–2020 NASA POWER climate normals with a CHELSA Climate DNA sampled at quality-filtered GBIF records for Monstera adansonii. The outdoor score and the indoor care-pressure calendar answer different questions: whether outdoor macroclimate overlaps the plant’s recorded native climate, and when a local potted plant may need closer observation. Read the standalone Monstera Adansonii Climate DNA profile for the full native-record distributions, occurrence footprint, filtering funnel, confidence, and source provenance behind these comparisons. ...

These city guides compare local 1991–2020 NASA POWER climate normals with a CHELSA Climate DNA sampled at quality-filtered GBIF records for Crassula ovata. The outdoor score and the indoor care-pressure calendar answer different questions: whether outdoor macroclimate overlaps the plant’s recorded native climate, and when a local potted plant may need closer observation. Read the standalone Jade Plant Climate DNA profile for the full native-record distributions, occurrence footprint, filtering funnel, confidence, and source provenance behind these comparisons. ...

These city guides compare local 1991–2020 NASA POWER climate normals with a CHELSA Climate DNA sampled at quality-filtered GBIF records for Philodendron hederaceum. The outdoor score and the indoor care-pressure calendar answer different questions: whether outdoor macroclimate overlaps the plant’s recorded native climate, and when a local potted plant may need closer observation. Read the standalone Heartleaf Philodendron Climate DNA profile for the full native-record distributions, occurrence footprint, filtering funnel, confidence, and source provenance behind these comparisons. ...

These city guides compare local 1991–2020 NASA POWER climate normals with a CHELSA Climate DNA sampled at quality-filtered GBIF records for Ficus lyrata. The outdoor score and the indoor care-pressure calendar answer different questions: whether outdoor macroclimate overlaps the plant’s recorded native climate, and when a local potted plant may need closer observation. Read the standalone Fiddle Leaf Fig Climate DNA profile for the full native-record distributions, occurrence footprint, filtering funnel, confidence, and source provenance behind these comparisons. ...

These city guides compare local 1991–2020 NASA POWER climate normals with a CHELSA Climate DNA sampled at quality-filtered GBIF records for Strelitzia reginae. The outdoor score and the indoor care-pressure calendar answer different questions: whether outdoor macroclimate overlaps the plant’s recorded native climate, and when a local potted plant may need closer observation. Read the standalone Bird of Paradise Climate DNA profile for the full native-record distributions, occurrence footprint, filtering funnel, confidence, and source provenance behind these comparisons. ...

These city guides compare local 1991–2020 NASA POWER climate normals with a CHELSA Climate DNA sampled at quality-filtered GBIF records for Monstera deliciosa. The outdoor score and the indoor care-pressure calendar answer different questions: whether outdoor macroclimate overlaps the plant’s recorded native climate, and when a local potted plant may need closer observation. Read the standalone Monstera Climate DNA profile for the full native-record distributions, occurrence footprint, filtering funnel, confidence, and source provenance behind these comparisons. ...